It (And I say this as someone who owned a Panasonic LX5, which does have the same basic design as the LX3/D-Lux 4.). Découvrez les Panasonic DC-LX100 II - Experts - Le LX100 II combine un grand capteur Micro 4/3 17 MP à un objectif ultra lumineux LEICA DC Vario-Summilux F1.7-2.8. Not that they care, but, this iteration is a disappointment as a follow up model. Changing the zoom range is a major undertaking. RAW Aufnahmen wurden entwickelt und als JPEG mit Qualitätseinstellung "maximal" gespeichert und stehen hier ebenfalls zum Download in voller Auflösung bereit. Panasonic LX100 II vs Panasonic LX100 – Features. Niestety, Lumix nie do końca odrobił lekcję. The A6300+16-50 mm is also heavier and larger: 520 to 392 g, 120 vs 115 mm width, 71.5 vs 64.2 mm depth, 66.9 vs 66.2 mm. Le Lumix LX100 II propose un mode Ultra HD faussement appelé 4K en vidéo pour une définition réelle de 3840 x 2160 px. It has the latest Sony APSC 24MP sensor. It features six aspherical elements, a newly designed manual focus ring and weather-sealing. But now many cameras easily shoot at ISO 12,800, which affords the use of slower lenses in many instances. By far the best smarphone camera ever released (and still not as good as the LX100 I/II) was one from 2015, ironically made by Panasonic. For maximum sharpness, you will want to The LX100 II is available at an MSRP of $999 (a $100 premium over the original). Not only do raw files allow for a bit more resolution, they also have a nice amount Right, the Sony has a better EVF, and likely better better AF, or at least better tracking AF. If we have reason to doubt the claims, we'll remove them. "It must have been you that i went down the stupid S3 rabbit hole with before, with you defending the S3's ergos as as-good-as the D5's.". As (I hope) you can see from this picture, the button layout is the same. The closest lenses for M4/3 are the Panasonic 12-35mm 1:2.8 Lumix G X Vario ASPH OIS and the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40 mm f/2.8 Pro. No, the D-Lux 4 is not the same basic design, unless you mean all cameras with a zoom affixed to the body have the same basic design. The EVF in the RX100 line is, while tiny, fairly pleasant to use as well. I forgot about the Lumix line, and didn't know the Oly Toughs went that wide. "Really ? near the camera's minimum focus distance. Autofocus performance on the LX100 II is quite good. is fixed on the camera and thus cannot be tilted. The contrast-detect autofocus system does a considerable amount of With a 23mm prime it would be dainty next to my 6D. On the top of the lens, right next the camera body itself, is a switch "Through your numerous posts, I have noticed that you rarely accept to be corrected when you are wrong..". In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best. Since my post I have learned that Panasonic's claim of "countermeasures" is complete hogwash. Even Nikon 1j5 and 1v3 were sharper with kit lenses.So this is a very questionable camera. Cameras like the Canon R and the Nikon Z7 came out months ago. If you've got negatives from way back when, what's the best software around to scan them? the AF area option, and then finally you move the point around using all four If only it had a tilting lcd...oh well guess it's just not for me. Außerdem sind darin wichtige Nutzungshinweise wie zum Beispiel der Pflege des Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II thalten. LX100 II retains most of the features that made the original LX100 such a pleasant camera to use, making it a good choice for serious photographers who want a compact walkaround camera. I want a fast compact camera for street, family and travel. I think the challenge with ultrawides is that the angle of incidence increases notably vs. longer lengths. "And that's the thing; every single Leica made is intended and marketed as a street machine. I hate the explosion of buttons and functions and dense menus on most modern cameras. The camera focuses quickly Entertaining if not informative . It uses up to ~85% of the area of a Four Thirds-sized sensor to give a choice of aspect ratios without narrowing the field of view. At the end of the year 2018, the Leica SL still has the best EVF. But notice my list above doesn't mention the M. "Leicas now are not marketed as studio/landscape cameras despite that really being all they can excel at.". intelligently-designed, the user experience is good and the image quality is My comment was in response to Mach Schnell. It's just that more of the existing buttons are now customizable FN buttons. To test real-life performance, I shot this scene with the Panasonic Lumix LX100 II and the Canon PowerShot G1X III using their best quality JPEG settings and at their base sensitivity settings. I want a compact travel camera with good image quality and raw dynamic range and thought this was it until all the dust hullabaloo. No interchangeable lenses breaking that (24 mm equiv.) So the LX100 II isn’t the most expensive of its type on the market, but even so it’s going to have to be pretty special to justify the price tag. ", Panasonic iq is equivalent to 24-75mm f3.2-6.2, I am sorry but that is too slow for me... Fuji has a better equivalent zoom - google it. It is similar to its predecessor in that it offers a relatively large sensor in a sleek, compact camera body with a fast built-in zoom lens. Its uncorrected distortion and vignetting figures are nothing short of insane. (Asterisks added by me for emphasis). Perhaps they mean for a 4/3 sensor it is excellent. I can't be helped if you don't know what CE means. HowaboutRAW:I agree, the IQ is much better than a phone but I would have thought that those that appreciates higher IQ, would also appreciate something a little more versatile. High-end EVF, Tilt Screen, IBIS, Full Featured Video specs... Anyhows, you be describing a camera that would retail for a good deal more than $1000. Just because their optical quality is so good they have gotten away with murderous pricing and criminally underspeced, embarrassing, bodies for far too long. Often fast lenses aren't sharp all the way open either, the Panasonic at f/1.7 has that problem. You could, of course, press Panasonic to give you DETAILED PROOF of their "dust ingress countermeasures" claim (the bizarre wording itself should have been a red flag...) and then amend your article accordingly.Or maybe not. It is definitely a decent m43 camera but long gone are the aspirations of GX1 in terms of m43 potential as an interchangeable model with great appeal to enthusiasts. But to me, when looking at specs and what it can do, I find the successor very appealing. generally good. hunting and makes regular minor adjustments, even when the subject hasn't moved within How about. "not much larger than your beloved panasonic that makes half decent potos with a crappy zoom.". The LX100 II is a compact and stylish camera, much like its predecessor. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 has been a solid sales performer since it was introduced almost four years ago, which says volumes about the camera. The GF series is an interesting story. Looks like a great camera. Although not new to the Mark II, an interesting feature of the camera, which While the SX60HS' lens is by no means the greatest, it pulled off 65x starting at 21mm. The Lumix S 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 Macro OIS is a tele-zoom lens designed for Panasonic's full-frame mirrorless cameras. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing over $2500 and recommended the best. The camera is It has a lovely combination of creative features, traditional exposure controls, an excellent viewfinder and good build quality. Built-in 24 to 75mm-equivalent lens with f/1.7-2.8 aperture range, Up to 11 frames per second continuous shooting, A lot of physical controls on the body and lens, The lens' aperture changes quickly as you zoom in, Somewhat disappointing autofocus performance when recording video. Also while you're looking for a zoom like that of the LX100 but for the Olympus price an f/2.0 12mm m4/3 system lens. We've shot our studio scene with the LX100 II to see how it compares with its rivals. It uses up to ~85% of the area of a Four Thirds-sized sensor to give a choice of aspect ratios without narrowing the field of view. So how does it perform? Right the SL doesn't compete with the Nikon D5 for AF. The Panasonic in question here (the one being the subject of this review) has 17 MP, not 12 MP. But somehow it is not a problem when it comes to the Panny? Panasonic claims to have worked on the LX100's dust problem. . To Richard Butler:"However, following claims of improved sealing around the lens, we are told: "There is no additional urethane sealing used but we have a countermeasure to prevent the dust ingress with the LX100M2. While the body might not be much larger, the LX is the eight of the EM's top plate without dials, but an equivalent lens would make the EM huge by comparison. and bring up the shadows without significantly degrading image quality. You've also still not managed to name a Fuji APSC zoom that is the equivalent in zoom/speed to this Panasonic's lens. I have to suppose that's a case of projection. performance showcase this well. UHD 4K video samples taken with Panasonic Lumix LX100 II camera in various shooting conditions. Thanks a lot, will wait for first units to come to my ,ocal shop.I am worried about new fn buttons, as on lx100 one of most important buttons for me (video RECj is locat d close to FN buttons. Your call. The Perseverance rover has successfully landed on Mars. the only difference is pixel does great at jpeg rendering out of the box and you have to waste time processing your travel images to get the same results.. forgot to mention, you cant shoot portraits on panasonic with great bokeh, pixel does it with finesse it looks like a 1.4 50mm equivalent, "if i wanted real quality such as weddings, I would shoot fuji, not some half decent panasonic.". Click through to see our picks. Being cooped up inside doesn't mean you have to take a break from photography. The GFX 100S fits most of the capabilities of the GFX 100 into a smaller and more affordable body. of flexibility. And I see Leica Ms on the street every week. Oh, and the PanaLeica lens in this Panasonic is just good, not great. Try using the DLSR mirror focusing system sans prism/mirror atop. The existence of the Leica brand in the camera world has one very important but unintended consequence. Panasonic would be crazy to claim the LX100 II is "dust proof". The 50MP sensor in the Alpha 1 is all-new, and represents the latest technology that Sony is capable of. I find it hard to believe that if anyone looked through this model, and then through the G9, that they would opt for the LX100 II. Hey DPReview, thanks for the great review.. Leica gear is expensive, frequently not justifiably so. Die Leica D-Lux 7 ist eine Edelkompakte mit Four-Thirds-Sensor, deren technische Daten denen der Panasonic Lumix LX100 II entsprechen. In that order. It is sort of luck thing but some copies are pretty good.One of say 5 or 10. I'm sorry f stops confuse you. dedicated shutter speed and exposure compensation dials. Test Lumix DC-LX100M2 : Le Lumix LX100 II est un compact expert muni d'un gros capteur 4/3'. "Who cares? Best of its time. I never noticed, I am happy to know... "Then you named it wrongly, because this hump in a DSLR in not the mirror box. oh, i see you already familiar with the resource, just thought I might help out and point you into the right direction, in case you weren't in the loop ). It’s on the small side though.